| Pages: [1] |
1. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Even CSM member Steve "Fuzzysteve" Ronuken , industrialist extraordinaire, gets that every change to the game should be primarily considered as to whether it increases or reduces confilct. Of course, the reality of Eve is co...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.26 13:21:46
|
2. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: Firstly, the removal of AWOXing isn't something that can be compared to the reprocessing changes. I'm aware of people who used the old reprocessing system for two things: 1) exporting minerals from highsec to null via mod...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.26 11:52:50
|
3. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: But it is ungentlemanly to belittle a fellow player for objecting to a particular change, especially one that directly and significantly impacts what they do in the game, or other players for supporting any particular CSM can...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.26 11:36:49
|
4. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: think you are under a bit of a misapprehension about the reason for the change to intracorp aggression actually is. CCP has indicated that it is actually to increase interaction, and therefore conflict by getting more new pl...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.25 00:19:18
|
5. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Then you need to stop acting like people are upset about "a minor change". It's dismissive and dishonest. Except you are. At this point you are upset at the idea of giving ideas that reduce conflict a reasonable look be...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.24 17:02:20
|
6. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: but then again players from your camp never have been very good at reasoning, just exploding into "ZOMG You want total safety! I'm paying it forward! Waah, waah why u nerf me ccp" every time a mino...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.24 00:41:31
|
7. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Then they shouldn't be improved in that way. There are plenty of ways to improve this game's PvE without crippling player interaction. Again, you seem to have no concept of a minor change. A change to improve PVE which ...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 13:47:46
|
8. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: That's the whole point. There is no merit to ideas that reduce player interaction. None. They should be dismissed out of hand. You sir are incorrect. There is more to EVE than the specific way you play it, and to impr...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 12:36:44
|
9. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: EVE's biggest strength is the depth of player interaction. That is undeniable. Changes don't have to generate conflict. But changes that take away from conflict by definition take away player interaction. That is not ...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 11:37:42
|
10. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: I don't get where these people claiming that CCP are changing AWOXing to protect newbies. I do not advocate this, but if you wanted to make a change to PVP to protect newbies, you would prevent lowsec gatecamping. THAT is...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 10:32:32
|
11. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: If I buy Call of Duty, and then go on their forums and complain that other people are allowed to shoot me, I would probably be banned for trolling, and rightfully so. EVE Online is no less a PvP game. Whether you partak...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 10:25:40
|
12. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: The problem is that CCP itself has lost the plot here, and in blind pursuit of MOAR SUBS have clearly shown with each newly proposed nerf (like giving corps a 'no AWOXing' switch, and 'social corporations' that cann...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 07:36:52
|
13. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: While Feyd is being a little dogmatic on purpose to highlight the many recent changes to the game that have indeed reduced conflict and therefore content (and have made the game more boring), his core point is correct - chang...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.23 07:20:33
|
14. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Tengu Grib wrote: Tim Timpson wrote: Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: "If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced" Tha...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.22 08:38:12
|
15. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: "If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced" That's an incredibly simple view to take on co...
- by Tim Timpson - at 2015.01.21 22:19:36
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |